Why Compare Churchill with Gandhi

It peeves me no end, when Sonia and her family is called the Nehru – Gandhi family. She is neither the Nehru family nor the Gandhi family. It also peeves me when some researchers having pretensions of scholarship endeavor to comparatively analyse Gandhi and Churchill. To me, this exercise if not only misplaced but frivolous too, as it compares apples with mangoes. Whereas, Churchill was a PM par excellence, Gandhi was a yogi, with a mission more noble and methodology more exalted than all else. While Churchill slaved no end to ensure that the sun did not set on the  ill-gotten empire of the crown, Gandhi led a people to enlightenment and freedom. 

Churchill was a great war prime minister and perhaps key in stemming the destructive tide that Germany had become. He could see the designs of Hitler succeed only if the Island Kingdome would collapse. So if England was saved, Europe would be saved. And Churchill did save Europe.

But his analysis of Gandhi was quite shallow and misplaced. He would always oppose any dialog that the Indian Viceroys would have with Gandhi, and desired that Gandhi be ignored and marginalized.

Churchill detested Gandhi not only at the plane of philosophy, but found him unbearable even in conduct, demeanor and mannerisms. He knew, that the east of different. Self denial and abnegation were virtues that the east admired so much that nothing could be a stronger rallying point for the people than Gandhi’s simplicity and self denial.

He also understood, this "middle temple lawyer's" - Gandhi’s ( Churchill pejoratively called Gandhi so) fetish for half dressing could actually wreck the textile industry of Britain. Gandhi’s fastidiousness about food, and his demand for special vegetarian food and milk diet at the Viceregal lodge (whenever he would go to meet the viceroy) in India, would have a mesmerizing impact on the entire country. A simple act of eating vegetarian food and mild will take India closer to freedom. As per the cultural ethos of the country, the age old traditions it cherished, it meant, marking a definitive cultural victory. It was not merely about food. It was a mood that marked ones civilizational superiority. The west was materially much more advanced, but that material advancement was being eschewed and denounced by Gandhi. The east was supposed to be metaphysically more advanced, and that is exactly what was being wooed by Gandhi. Churchill could see this.

But where Churchill failed was, he even remotely in his dreams never did imagine, a diminutive half clad man could deliver the country from the British yoke. He faltered in his judgment of Gandhi.