Why Compare Churchill with Gandhi

It peeves me no end, when Sonia and her family is called the Nehru – Gandhi family. She is neither the Nehru family nor the Gandhi family. It also peeves me when some researchers having pretensions of scholarship endeavor to comparatively analyse Gandhi and Churchill. To me, this exercise if not only misplaced but frivolous too, as it compares apples with mangoes. Whereas, Churchill was a PM par excellence, Gandhi was a yogi, with a mission more noble and methodology more exalted than all else. While Churchill slaved no end to ensure that the sun did not set on the  ill-gotten empire of the crown, Gandhi led a people to enlightenment and freedom. 

Churchill was a great war prime minister and perhaps key in stemming the destructive tide that Germany had become. He could see the designs of Hitler succeed only if the Island Kingdome would collapse. So if England was saved, Europe would be saved. And Churchill did save Europe.

But his analysis of Gandhi was quite shallow and misplaced. He would always oppose any dialog that the Indian Viceroys would have with Gandhi, and desired that Gandhi be ignored and marginalized.

Churchill detested Gandhi not only at the plane of philosophy, but found him unbearable even in conduct, demeanor and mannerisms. He knew, that the east of different. Self denial and abnegation were virtues that the east admired so much that nothing could be a stronger rallying point for the people than Gandhi’s simplicity and self denial.

He also understood, this "middle temple lawyer's" - Gandhi’s ( Churchill pejoratively called Gandhi so) fetish for half dressing could actually wreck the textile industry of Britain. Gandhi’s fastidiousness about food, and his demand for special vegetarian food and milk diet at the Viceregal lodge (whenever he would go to meet the viceroy) in India, would have a mesmerizing impact on the entire country. A simple act of eating vegetarian food and mild will take India closer to freedom. As per the cultural ethos of the country, the age old traditions it cherished, it meant, marking a definitive cultural victory. It was not merely about food. It was a mood that marked ones civilizational superiority. The west was materially much more advanced, but that material advancement was being eschewed and denounced by Gandhi. The east was supposed to be metaphysically more advanced, and that is exactly what was being wooed by Gandhi. Churchill could see this.

But where Churchill failed was, he even remotely in his dreams never did imagine, a diminutive half clad man could deliver the country from the British yoke. He faltered in his judgment of Gandhi.    

SOME QUESTIONS TO RAHUL GANDHI

CHUM, WHAT IS YOUR AMBITION IN LIFE?

WHAT IS THAT YOU LIKE DOING MOST?

PEOPLE CLAIM YOU HAVE LIED TO THEM ABOUT YOUR EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION, IS THAT TRUE?

THERE IS ALSO A STORY YOU WERE DETAINED AT BOSTON AND FBI WAS ASKED TO INTERVENE TO GET YOU FREE, IS THAT TRUE?

WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS YOUR SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION TO THE COUNTRY IN YOUR 40 YRS OF LIFE?

WHAT DO YOU THINK AILS THE COUNTRY MOST?

YOUR SISTER APPEARS TO BE A BETTER CROWD PULLER, WOULD YOU LIKE TO VACATE IN HER FAVOR?

CAN YOU PROMISE NOT TO LET YOUR ‘GETS ON MY NERVES’ BROTHER IN LAW WILL NOT RIDE YOUR FAMILY EQUITY AND ENTER POLITICS?

WHY DO YOU OR VADRA HAS Z++ SECURITY COVER?

The Joke Presidentship is

Finally tonight, I listened to a debate on how lack-lustre and controversy courting the tenure of Pratibha Patil was as president of India.

The Congress spokeswoman Renuka Choudhary exhibited her hallmark uninhibited eloquence as highlighting Ms Patil’s contribution to the nation by way of improving the gardens of Rashtrapati Bhavan.

This is India, and here, peoples’ expectations of their leaders is so abysmally low, that it takes eons for disillusionment to set in and even longer for political perdition to catch up with these politicians. So for a large portion of their active lives, their indiscretions, their improprieties and often brazen pursuit of personal priorities at the expense of public exchequer go unpunished and un-admonished.

In the US the lady governor of South Carolina was hauled up for her jaunt to Europe, which cost the exchequer USD 127,000 only. Compare it with the per capita GDP of the US. In stark contrast, look at the USD 40 mn that Pratibha Patil spends on her jaunts, and compare is to the less than a dollar a day on which most of India survives. But the ledger of public accountability is so weak, you can get away with murder. You are safe and will do your term as president till the time Sonia Gandhi is merciful.  

To add insult to injury, the congress spokeswoman Renuka called it a learning curve for the first woman president. Come on have a conscience.

President of India

Now there is politics about the new president of the country. Consensus candidate or a contested candidate that is the question. A moot question indeed. But the political polemics notwithstanding, this position even though titular is clearly the highest office of the country. Last time we saw, a diminutive Pratibha Patil, insipid, unsung and verily vapid, catapult into the top seat of the country.  A proclaimed loyalist of the Nehru – Gandhi family. Intriguingly, a family, that has merely a matri-linear link to Nehru, and actually no link to Gandhi, has nevertheless managed to usurp and copyright the Nehru-Gandhi appellation and milk its equity.

If you would browse the CV of Patil, she is merely a bachelors in law. But it appears, she has fought elections only to win and has never lost one. But in India we all know, how elections are won. I have never one bit doubted the sagacity of the Indian electorate, despite low literacy of its sizeable majority. But the whole electoral systems needs an overhaul. A system that is throwing some most undesirable people into high positions of public service like MPs and MLAs, clearly is crying for an overhaul.

Scrap the first past the post system, or scrap the multiple party multiple candidate system without endangering the Ferderal Structure and without undermining the constitutional pillars of our democracy.

Hamid Ansari for president, will make another insipid candidate after Patil, if he manages to steal the race from others. But of course, his credentials are much better. A civil servant of a batch 7 years before I was born. Therefore old. And this is another phenomenon that I can never understand. Why do we hunt out such old people for such positions. In the parliamentary system, the president’s is essentially a ceremonial office, but its passivity gets compounded by the shear age of the incumbents. Who can deny, that with age, as much as wisdom may not get impaired but even enhanced, energy levels seriously are.

Take a look at the BRICS document of the Delhi Summit. It is a clear pointer of the fact that emerging geographies if they would open their markets to advanced countries, it would not be without extracting their pound of flesh. They would like to have a say in world affairs. They would like to participate in deciding the fate of Iran or at least protect their interest with Iran.

In this changing scenario, when India is, along with emerging geographies deciding to throw its weight in global decision making, and is keenly wanting to eschew its position of a passive or at best fringe player, the position of president assumes even greater significance.

In the new normal, as economic development and growth gravitate to Asia, as China cedes some growth to India, as other markets like Vietnam etc. wait in the wings to outstep the best in GDP growth rate, as Russia prepares for the presidency of the G20 in 2013, as India ramps up its trade with Africa to USD 90 bn, that we have a president who is dynamic and can represent us such forums is extremely critical.